Free cloud & LLM pricing tools — AWS EC2 + LLM API Pricing Explorer

GPT-5.6 Luna vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash pricing

Side-by-side LLM API pricing.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on input ($0.15 vs $0.20 /1M), and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on output ($0.60 vs $1.20 /1M). On a blended average, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is lower — but which wins for you depends on your input/output mix, so check the example workloads below or run the calculator.

AttributeGPT-5.6 LunaDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ProviderOpenAIDeepSeek
TierBudgetBudget
StatusGAGA
Context window1.05M1M
Input /1M$0.20$0.15
Output /1M$1.20$0.60
Cached input /1M$0.02$0.003
Batch input /1M$0.10—
Batch output /1M$0.60—
Blended (avg in+out)$0.70$0.375
1M in + 1M out$1.40$0.7500
1M in (90% cached) + 100K out$0.1580$0.0777

List prices, USD, directional. Rates are provider list prices per 1M tokens and are meant for comparison, not billing. Batch rates shown as 50% off are derived where a provider offers batch but does not publish a separate figure. Preview, promo, intro, peak/off-peak, long-context, and third-party-host prices are labeled where they apply. Token counts vary by tokenizer, so per-token price is not always a like-for-like cost. Always confirm with the provider before relying on a number. Prices as of 2026-09-29.

Which should you pick?

For a balanced job (1M input + 1M output), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.7500 versus $1.40. If your prompts are large and reused, prompt caching changes the maths — the cache-heavy row above shows a 90%-cached input scenario. If your work can run asynchronously, both providers' batch rates cut the bill further where offered.

Full price matrices: GPT-5.6 Luna pricing → · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash pricing → · Back to the LLM pricing hub →